Journal Articles
1. Carbon, C.C., Färber, S., Gerger, G., Forster, M. & Leder, H. (in press). Innovation is appreciated when we feel safe: On the situational dependence of the appreciation of innovation. International Journal of Design.
2. Leder, H., Ring, A. & Dressler, S. (in press). See me, feel me! Aesthetic evaluations of art portraits. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.
3. Graham, D.J., Stockinger, S. & Leder, H. (2013.). An island of stability: art images and natural scenes—but not natural faces—show consistent aesthetic response in Alzheimer’s-related dementia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1-8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00107,
4. Leder, H. (2013). Acknowledging the diversity of aesthetic experiences: effects of style, meaning and context. Commentary on Bullot and Reber. Behavioural and Brain, Sciences. Bullot & Reber for BBS 36(5) 2012. Commentary/ The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-framework for the science of art appreciation. http://journals.cambridge.org/repo_A88MjR9k
5. Leder, H. (2013). Next steps in Neuroaesthetics: Which processes and processing stages to study? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 27-37. doi:10.1037/a0031585
6. Forster, M., Leder, H. & Ansorge, U. (2012). It Felt Fluent, and I Liked It: Subjective Feeling of Fluency Rather Than Objective Fluency Determines Liking. Emotion. doi: 10.1037/a0030115
7. Leder, H., Bär, S. & Topolinski, S. (2012). Covert Painting Simulations Influence Aesthetic Appreciation of Artworks. Psychological Science, 1479-1481. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612452866
8. Graham, D.J., Hughes, J.M., Leder, H., Rockmore, D.N. (2012). Statistics, vision, and the analysis of artistic style. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 4, 115-123. Doi: 10.1002/wics.197
9. Leder, H., Gerger, G., Dressler, S.G., Schabmann, A. (2012). How art is appreciated. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 1-10. {IF = 1.230}
10. Miesler, L., Leder, H. & Herrmann, A. (2011). Isn’t It Cute: An Evolutionary Perspective of Baby-Schema Effects in Visual Product Designs. International Journal of Design. 5(3), 17-30
11. Leder, H., Tinio, P.P.L. & Bar, M. (2011). Emotional Valence Modulates the Preference for Curved Objects. Perception, 40, 649-655. {IF = 1.293}
12. Leder, H., Forster, M. & Gerger, G. (2011). The glasses stereotype revisited – Effects of glasses on perception, recognition and impressions of faces. Swiss Journal of Pychology. 70 (2), 2011, 75–83 {IF = 0.545}
13. Gerger, G., Leder, H., Tinio, P.P.T. & Schacht, A. (2011). Faces vs. Patterns: Exploring aesthetic reactions using facial EMG. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 241-250.
14. Jakesch, M., Zachhuber, M., Leder, H., Spingler, M. & Carbon, C. C. (2011). Scenario-based touching. On the influence of top-down processes on tactile and visual appreciation. Research in Engineering Design. 22(3), 143-152. {IF=1.038}
15. Faerber, S.J., Leder, H., Gerger, G., & Carbon, C. C. (2011). Priming semantic concepts affects the dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. Acta Psychologica. 135(2), 191-200.
16. Gerger, G., Leder, H., Faerber, S. J., & Carbon, C. C. (2011). When the others matter: Context-dependent effects on changes in appreciation of innovativeness. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 70(2), 75-83. {IF = 0.545}
17. Fuchs, I., Ansorge, U., Redies, C., & Leder, H. (2011). Salience in paintings: Bottom-up influences on eye fixations. Cognitive Computation, 3(1), 25-36.
18. Leder, H., Gerger, G., Dressler, S., Schabmann, A. (in press). Understanding art appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.
19. Leder, H., Tinio, P.T., Fuchs, I. & Bohrn, I. (2010). Attractive Faces Demand Longer Looks. The effects of situation and gender. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63 (9), 1858-1871.
20. Belke, B., Leder, H., Strobach, T., & Carbon, C. C. (2010). Cognitive fluency: High-level processing dynamics in art appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 4(4), 214-222.
21. Windhager, S., Hutzler, F., Carbon, C. C., Oberzaucher, E., Schaefer, K., Thorstensen, T., Leder, H., & Grammer, K. (2010). Laying eyes on headlights: Eye movements reveal facial features in cars. Collegium Antropologicum. 34, 1075-1080.
22. Belke, B., Leder, H., Harsanyi, G. & Carbon, C.C. (2010). When a Picasso is a “Picasso”: The entry point in the identification of visual art. Acta Psychologica, 133 (2), 191-202.
23. Jakesch, M. & Leder, H. (2009). Finding Meaning in Art. Preferred Levels of Ambiguity in Art Appreciation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2105-2112.
24. Kuchinke, L., Trapp, S., Jacobs, A.M., Leder, H. (2009). Pupillary responses in art appreciation: effects of aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 3(3), 156-163.
25. Tinio, P.P.T. & Leder, H. (2009). Natural scenes are indeed preferred, but image quality might have the last word. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), Feb 2009, 52-56.
26. Tinio, P.P.T. & Leder, H. (2009). Just how stable are aesthetic features? Symmetry, Complexity and the jaws of massive familiarization. Acta Psychologica, 130, 241-250.
27. Carbon, C. C., Michael, L., & Leder, H. (2008). Innovative concepts of car interiors measured by electro-dermal activity (EDA). Research in Engineering Design, 9(2-3), 143-149.
28. Augustin D.M., Leder, H., Hutzler, F. & Carbon, C.C. (2008). Style follows content. On the microgenesis of art perception. Acta Psychologica. 128(1), 127-138.
29. Lengger, P.G., Fischmeister, F.P., Leder, H., & Bauer, H. (2007) Functional Neuroanatomy of the Perception of Modern Art. A Dc-EEG-Study on the Influence of Stylistic Information on Aesthetic Experience. Brain Research, 1158, 93-102.
30. Hutzler, F., Braun, M., Vo, M. L.-H., Engl, V., Hofmann, M., Dambacher, M., Leder, H., Jacobs, A.M. (2007). Welcome to the real world: Validating Fixation Related Potentials for Ecologically Valid Settings. Brain Research, 1172, 124-129.
31. Stich,C., Knäuper, B., Eisermann, J. & Leder, H. (2007). Aesthetic Properties of Everyday Objects. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 104, 1139-1168.
32. Carbon, C. C., Strobach, T. Langton, S., Harsányi, G., Leder, H., & Kovacs, G. (2007). Adaptation effects of highly familiar faces: immediate and long lasting. Memory & Cognition. 35, 166-176.
33. Leder, H., Carbon, C.C. & Kreuzbauer, R. (2007). Product-Design Perception and Brand Strength. Thexis, 4-8.
34. Carbon, C.C. & Leder, H. (2007). Design Evaluation: From Typical Problems to State-of-the-Art Solutions. Thexis, 33-38.
35. Leder, H. (2006). Editorial: Aesthetics: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Psychology Science, 48 (2), 113-106.
36. Augustin, D. & Leder, H. (2006). Art expertise: a study of concepts and conceptual spaces. Psychology Science, 48 (2), 135-157.
37. Belke, B., Leder, H. & Augustin, D. (2006). Mastering style. Effects of explicit style-related information, art knowledge and affective state on appreciation of abstract paintings. Psychology Science, 48 (2), 115-135.
38. Carbon, C. C. & Leder, H. (2006). When faces are heads! View-dependent effects of faces altered relationally and componentially. Swiss Journal of Psychology. 65 (4), 245-252.
39. Leder, H., Carbon, C.C. & Ripsas, A. (2006). Entitling Art: Influence of different types of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121, 176-198.
40. Leder, H. & Carbon, C. C. (2006). Face-specific configural processing of relational information. British Journal of Psychology, 97(1), 19-29.
41. Carbon, C. C. & Leder, H. (2006). The Mona Lisa effect: is `our`Lisa fame or fake? Perception, 35(3), 411-414.
42. Carbon, C. C. & Leder, H. (2005). Face adaptation: Changing stable representations of familiar faces within minutes? Advances in Experimental Psychology, 1(1) 1-7.
43. Carbon, C.C. & Leder, H. (2005). Innovation in design and aesthetics: How attributes of innovation influence attractiveness in the long run. Perception, 34: 8-8 Suppl. S 2005.
44. Carbon, C. C., Schweinberger, S., Kaufmann, J. & Leder, H. (2005). The Thatcher illusion seen by the brain: An Event-Related Brain Potentials Study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 544-555.
45. Carbon, C. C. & Leder, H. (2005). The Wall inside the Brain. Overestimation of distances crossing the former iron curtain. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(4), 746-750.
46. Carbon, C. C. & Leder, H. (2005). The Repeated Evaluation Technique (RET). A method to measure dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 587-601.
47. Carbon, C. C. & Leder, H. (2005). When Feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces. Perception. 34(9), 1117-1134.
48. Leder, H., Augustin, D. & Belke, B. (2005). Art and Cognition! Consequences for experimental aesthetics. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, (2), 11-20.
49. Leder, H. & Carbon, C. C. (2005). Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 603-618.
50. Leder, H. & Carbon, C. C. (2005). When context hinders. Learn-test-compatibility in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A(2), 235-250.
51. Carbon, C.C. & Leder, H. (2004). Face recognition is not template-based. Perception, 33: 103-103 Suppl. S 2004.
52. Leder, H. & Carbon, C. C. (2004). Part to whole effects and configural processing in faces. Psychology Science, 46(4), 531-543.
53. Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A. & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgements. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489-508.
54. Leder, H. (2003). Familiar and Fluent! Style-related processing hypotheses in aesthetic appreciation. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 21 (2), 165-175.
55. Leder, H. (2001). Determinants of preference. When do we like what we know? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19 (2), 201-211.
56. Leder, H., Candrian, G., Huber, O. & Bruce, V. (2001). Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces. Perception, 30, 73-83.
57. Leder, H. (2001). Wenn Gesichter Kopf stehen. Was der Inversions-Effekt für die Gesichtserkennung bedeutet. Psychologische Rundschau, 52 (2), 75-84.
58. Leder, H. & Bruce, V. (2000). Inverting line drawings of faces. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 59 (3), 170-182.
59. Leder, H. & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognised: the role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513-536.
60. Leder, H. (1999). Matching line drawings of faces. Perception, 28, 1171-1175.
61. Macho, S. & Leder, H. (1998). Your eyes only? A test of interactive influence in the processing of facial features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24 (5), 1486-1500.
62. Leder, H. & Bruce, V. (1998). Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 449-473.
63. Huber, O. & Leder, H. (1997). Are more compact cartoons more funny? Humor, 10 (1), 91-103.
64. Leder, H. & Theiler, L. (1997). Matching 1.2. A Macintosh software tool for the presentation of photographic stimuli. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 3, 193-194.
65. Leder, H. (1996). Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing. Perception, 25, 355-366.
